Odonata as Bioindicators
Photo of Dragonfly by Northeast Regional Conservation Needs |
In
comparison to other macroinvertebrates in freshwater systems, dragonflies and
damselflies have been identified as a great bioindicator species. They are
commonly known, easily identified in the field, occupy different types of
habitats, sensitive to water quality changes as well as other ecological
conditions of their habitat and their species co-exists and interacts with a
diverse community, large enough for assessments, all significant being a bioindicator species. Dragonflies live in the water as larvae and are terrestrial
as adults, a challenge to biomonitoring if the different stages were affected
differently by environmental variables, but research has shown otherwise and can
be used to their advantage (Valente-Neto, 2016). Another
major reason for using dragonflies over macroinvertebrates in surveys is that
they are easy to observe and “provide a quick, and therefore low-cost,
indication of the health or richness of freshwaters” (Simaika, 2011).
An example
of the application of using odanates as a bioindicator to test the impact of human activity on
aquatic ecosystem is a study that looked at methylmercury contamination in
dragonfly larvae (Jeremiason, 2016). The release
of sulfate into the aquatic system was related to iron mining activity and
results in the formation of methylmercury. This study took samples of the water
and the dragonfly larvae to compare the concentrations of methylmercury as a
way of monitoring the contamination to these aquatic systems.
Photo of Wetland by Michigan Wetland Management District |
Currently
freshwater ecosystems like wetlands or ponds are suffering from the degradation
and loss of aquatic habitats due to fragmentation and pollution. This loss of habitat puts the survival of Odonates, significant to both terrestrial and
aquatic habitats, at risk. The loss of Odonates is a reflection of
environmental health. A major problem that has caused these major shifts in these
ecosystems and is putting stress on the environment is urbanization. As urban
areas begin to expand, there is removal of native vegetation, which results in
degradation and fragmentation of these habitats, the extraction and use of
water is resulting in the modification of hydraulic systems, the climate is
increasing due to the increase in pollution, and the rate of waste production
and pollution is far beyond the rate at which the environment can process and
degrade them (Villalobos-Jimenez, 2016). This
is not to say that urbanization is bad but an opportunity to learn more about
the mechanisms of ecosystems and understand how to maintain these ecosystems in
a continuously changing environment. Continued
research will allow us to better the management of urban areas and the
integration of diverse ecosystems.
Bibliography
Jeremiason, J., Reiser, T., Weitz, R.,
Berndt, M., & Aiken, G. (2016). Aeshnid dragonfly larvae as bioindicators
of methylmercury contamination in aquatic systems impacted by elevated sulfate
loading. Ecotoxicology, 25(3), 456-468.
doi:10.1007/s10646-015-1603-9
Simaika, J. P., & Samways, M. J.
(2011). Comparative assessment of indices of freshwater habitat conditions
using different invertebrate taxon sets. Ecological Indicators, 11(2),
370-378. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.005
Valente-Neto, F., de Oliveira Roque,
F., Rodrigues, M. E., Juen, L., & Swan, C. M. (2016). Toward a practical
use of Neotropical odonates as bioindicators: Testing congruence across
taxonomic resolution and life stages. Ecological Indicators, 61(Part
2), 952-959. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.052
Villalobos-Jimenez, G., Dunn, A. M.,
& Hassall, C. (2016). Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in urban ecosystems:
A review. European Journal Of Entomology, 113217-232.
doi:10.14411/eje.2016.027
Comments
Post a Comment